Redefining tinnitus: a complex neurological disorder and its genetic roots

Omnia Focus - Volume 1-2

Author

Sara Gomez-Cabellos, PhD

Published

May 2, 2024

Doi
Abstract

What is tinnitus exactly? A shift in the conception of tinnitus from being just a symptom of an underlying condition to being recognized as a neurological disorder redefines its long-established dogma definition.

Keywords

Tinnitus, Extreme phenotype, Neurological disorder, Ménière’s disorder

When was the last time you heard nothing, just silence? What a strange question to ask, you might be thinking. My answer might differ from yours, when I was 16. I suffer from tinnitus, continuous “ringing noises” in both of my ears, and my loyal companion for more than 20 years now.

The definition of tinnitus is precisely the phantom sensation of “ringing in the ears” or, in other words, the perception of noise in the absence of external acoustic stimulation. Despite being experienced by more than 15 % of the world’s population, it does not have a cure. The only solutions for those who suffer from it are limited to reducing their psychological distress or masking the symptoms by external sound sources. Still, there are no targeted treatments for the pathophysiological mechanisms1.

Tinnitus can be continuous, pulsatile, or episodic, affecting one or both ears. It can last only a few moments, months, years, or a lifetime. Severe tinnitus is a debilitating condition experienced by 1% of the population, and it has been discovered to have a significant heritability2,3.

Environmental factors were thought to be the main drivers of tinnitus for decades, but the widespread availability of sequencing data from distinct cohorts has opened new research possibilities4. The first study that defined tinnitus as a complex disorder in which genes and environmental factors interact was conducted by Clifford et al.5, performing a genome-wide association study (GWAS) using large datasets from self-reported tinnitus. The following year, Wells et al.6, with a case-control GWAS, identified RCOR1 (REST COREPRESSOR 1 ) as the gene with the highest significance in a sub-group of patients with the most severe form of tinnitus. Nevertheless, even though both analyses of GWAS used UK Biobank participants, there was little overlap in the strongest associations between both studies, possibly because of the significant heterogeneity in tinnitus phenotype4.

GWAS allows the identification of significant common variants with small effect sizes that confer susceptibility to tinnitus. However, Amanat et al.7 used a different approach to identify the enrichment of rare pathogenic variants and target candidate genes. This strategy consisted of selecting individuals with extreme clinical attributes, toxic effects, or extreme responses to treatments, i.e., extreme phenotype8, to narrow the phenotypic heterogeneity that tinnitus manifests.

Amanat et al.7 aimed to identify rare variants in synaptic genes by exome sequencing of Spanish patients with Ménière’s disease and an extreme tinnitus phenotype, performing a gene burden analysis (GBA). The disease of Ménière is a rare ear disorder characterized by intense episodes of vertigo, tinnitus, and hearing loss9. After years of the disease, patients consider tinnitus the most debilitating symptom10,11.

Their research uncovered a burden of rare missense and structural variants in several synaptic genes. Three candidate genes, ANK2 (ANKYRIN-2 ), TSC2 (TSC COMPLEX SUBUNIT 2 ), and AKAP9 (A-KINASE ANCHOR PROTEIN 9 ), were replicated in a Swedish cohort of patients with severe tinnitus. Moreover, to determine if the association of these genes was specific to severe tinnitus, they performed a GBA using an independent cohort of patients with generalized genetic epilepsy who did not have tinnitus. Some neurological disorders, such as epilepsy, could also share some common genetic background with tinnitus. None of the genes showed significant enrichment of missense variants, confirming the tinnitus-specificity of the candidate genes.

Gene ontology and gene-set enrichment analysis uncovered the involvement of membrane trafficking and cytoskeletal protein binding in neurons. ANK2, TSC2, and AKAP9 are associated with axonal branching and neuron connectivity in the brain, and their expression in spiral ganglion neurons was confirmed. Furthermore, ANK2 and TSC2 showed significant co-expression in limbic brain regions.

This study presents several limitations, such as a lack of representation of the whole phenotype of Ménière’s disease using the extreme phenotype strategy or the possibility that other neural pathways unrelated to synapses are also implicated in tinnitus. Nevertheless, it provides a first reference point in understanding the molecular players in severe tinnitus, and it could be a significant step forward in its future treatment.

Back to top

References

1.
McFerran, D. J., Stockdale, D., Holme, R., Large, C. H. & Baguley, D. M. Why is there no cure for tinnitus? Frontiers in neuroscience 13, 466176 (2019).
2.
Trpchevska, N. et al. Sex-dependent aggregation of tinnitus in swedish families. Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, 3812 (2020).
3.
Maas, I. L. et al. Genetic susceptibility to bilateral tinnitus in a swedish twin cohort. Genetics in Medicine 19, 1007–1012 (2017).
4.
Vona, B. The road traveled and journey ahead for the genetics and genomics of tinnitus. Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy 26, 129–136 (2022).
5.
Clifford, R. E., Maihofer, A. X., Stein, M. B., Ryan, A. F. & Nievergelt, C. M. Novel risk loci in tinnitus and causal inference with neuropsychiatric disorders among adults of european ancestry. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery 146, 1015–1025 (2020).
6.
Wells, H. R., Abidin, F. N. Z., Freidin, M. B., Williams, F. M. & Dawson, S. J. Genome-wide association study suggests that variation at the RCOR1 locus is associated with tinnitus in UK biobank. Scientific Reports 11, 6470 (2021).
7.
Amanat, S. et al. Burden of rare variants in synaptic genes in patients with severe tinnitus: An exome based extreme phenotype study. EBioMedicine 66, (2021).
8.
Amanat, S., Requena, T. & Lopez-Escamez, J. A. A systematic review of extreme phenotype strategies to search for rare variants in genetic studies of complex disorders. Genes 11, 987 (2020).
9.
Perez-Carpena, P. & Lopez-Escamez, J. A. Current understanding and clinical management of meniere’s disease: A systematic review. in Seminars in neurology vol. 40 138–150 (Thieme Medical Publishers, 2020).
10.
Ueberfuhr, M. A., Wiegrebe, L., Krause, E., Gürkov, R. & Drexl, M. Tinnitus in normal-hearing participants after exposure to intense low-frequency sound and in ménière’s disease patients. Frontiers in neurology 7, 219513 (2017).
11.
Herraiz, C., Tapia, M. & Plaza, G. Tinnitus and meniere’s disease: Characteristics and prognosis in a tinnitus clinic sample. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck 263, 504–509 (2006).

Citation

BibTeX citation:
@misc{gomez-cabellos2024,
  author = {Gomez-Cabellos, Sara},
  publisher = {Omnia},
  title = {Redefining Tinnitus: A Complex Neurological Disorder and Its
    Genetic Roots},
  volume = {1},
  number = {2},
  date = {2024-05-02},
  url = {https://www.mauromaver.eu/posts/posts_omnia/omnia_focus_II/},
  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.10955449},
  langid = {en},
  abstract = {What is tinnitus exactly? A shift in the conception of
    tinnitus from being just a symptom of an underlying condition to
    being recognized as a neurological disorder redefines its
    long-established dogma definition.}
}
For attribution, please cite this work as:
Gomez-Cabellos, S. Redefining tinnitus: a complex neurological disorder and its genetic roots. Omnia Focus vol. 1 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10955449 (2024).